<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sven Slootweg&#039;s Blog &#187; phenomenon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/tag/phenomenon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog</link>
	<description>Plenty bits and bytes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Unexplained Phenomenon &#8211; Part 3: The solution?!</title>
		<link>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-3-the-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-3-the-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sven Slootweg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joseph james chung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenomenon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the o campaign foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexplained]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 2: http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/ I&#8217;ve been digging around the internet a little more on the Google Unexplained Phenomenon. I actually found Andrew Healey&#8217;s take on the things at http://halfloaded.com/blog/unexplained-phenomenom-googles-doodle-gogle/. He specifically names the site http://www.unexplainedphenomenon.org/ that I expected to be a scam site (he even states it as a fact), while http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/06/is-this-the-real-answer-to-googles-unexplained-phenomenon-puzzle/ tells us about Joseph [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Part 2: </strong><a href="http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/"><strong>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/</strong></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been digging around the internet a little more on the Google Unexplained Phenomenon. I actually found Andrew Healey&#8217;s take on the things at <a href="http://halfloaded.com/blog/unexplained-phenomenom-googles-doodle-gogle/">http://halfloaded.com/blog/unexplained-phenomenom-googles-doodle-gogle/</a>. He specifically names the site http://www.unexplainedphenomenon.org/ that I expected to be a scam site (he even states it as a fact), while <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/06/is-this-the-real-answer-to-googles-unexplained-phenomenon-puzzle/">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/06/is-this-the-real-answer-to-googles-unexplained-phenomenon-puzzle/</a> tells us about Joseph James Chung, and about this mystery possibly being a stunt for the O Campaign Foundation.</p>
<p>I tried to sign up to the unexplainedphenomenon.org site with fake details (you can always try, right?) to see what happens. It presented me with an error page.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-50" title="proof" src="http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/proof.PNG" alt="proof" width="1091" height="526" /></p>
<p>Now, after looking up this e-mail, guess whose profile page we find? Take a look at <a href="http://www.thalas.com/people_joseph_james_chung.html">http://www.thalas.com/people_joseph_james_chung.html</a>. I&#8217;ll quote two very important parts:</p>
<p><em>Joseph has worked with Google, [...]</em></p>
<p><em>He is the co-director of The O Campaign Foundation, a 4,600,000+ member campaign for cancer research and prevention.</em></p>
<p>Might the answer of TechCrunch, it being a promotional stunt for the O Campaign Foundation, actually be true? It sure looks like it, and I honestly don&#8217;t think that unexplainedphenomenon.org is an ordinary scam site.  &#8221;Unexplained phenomenon&#8221; could easily refer to cancer. Which makes the picture complete.</p>
<p>Joseph James Chung set up unexplainedphenomenon.org, and cooperated with Google to get publicity for The O Campaign Foundation. Looks correct to me, especially since Google is usually very charitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-3-the-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google Unexplained Phenomenon &#8211; Part 2, the story goes on</title>
		<link>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/</link>
		<comments>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sven Slootweg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenomenon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexplained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1 of this post can be found here: http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/05/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon/ I&#8217;ve been digging through the web a bit, and I found an article on Telegraph.co.uk stating the Google doodle mystery has been solved. It basically tells us that Google has decided to celebrate the anniversary of the &#8220;All your base are belong to us&#8221; meme [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Part 1 of this post can be found here: <a style="text-decoration: none;" href="http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/05/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon/">http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/05/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon/</a></strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been digging through the web a bit, and I found <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/6145894/Google-unexplained-phenomenon-doodle-mystery-solved.html">an article on Telegraph.co.uk</a> stating the Google doodle mystery has been solved. It basically tells us that Google has decided to celebrate the anniversary of the &#8220;All your base are belong to us&#8221; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme">meme</a> from the Japanese game Zero Wing.</p>
<p>The article, however, doesn&#8217;t tell us who published this news. Is it really a Google employee that released this information? Or is it just made up by some guy browsing the web, and having the genius idea to &#8220;solve&#8221; the doodle? You&#8217;d think a rather big site like Telegraph.co.uk would provide some source of their information, but strangely they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p><em>Google did nothing to end the speculation with a statement saying: &#8220;We consider the second &#8216;o&#8217; critical to user recognition of our brand and pronunciation of our name. We are actively looking into the mysterious tweet that has appeared on the Google twitter stream and the disappearance of the &#8216;o&#8217; on the Google home page. We hope to have an update in the coming weeks.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t that sound like Google didn&#8217;t actually tell anyone the solution?</p>
<p><em>The truth, however, was that it was marking the 20th anniversary of Japanese video game Zero Wing.</em></p>
<p>No source is named anywhere in that piece of text. After this bit of information, the article continues, telling us about the origin of the phrase, and how it became popular. But still no mention of a source anywhere.</p>
<p>In the meantime, some sites take handy advantage of this event. For example, <a href="http://www.unexplainedphenomenon.org/">http://www.unexplainedphenomenon.org/</a> seems to promise more info about this &#8220;Unexplained Phenomenom&#8221;, but looks very suspicious. Personally I doubt it&#8217;s a real site, and I actually suspect it of being an outright scam. At the same time, <a href="http://www.googleunexplainedphenomenon.com/">http://www.googleunexplainedphenomenon.com/</a> is a site completely dedicated to finding the solution of this mystery. They give us some new info, including a machine translation of a Korean Google blog post.</p>
<p>Apparently this is the first hint in the form of a doodle, in a series of hints that will eventually lead us to the solution of the mystery. GoogleUnexplainedPhenomenom.com also lists a few possible answers to this mystery, that can be thought of with the current amount of information and hints. I guess we will have to wait until September 15 to get the next clue, and see what this is all about.</p>
<p>Still, what is the goal Google is trying to achieve? Are they purely trying to get attention and do some pre-marketing for a new product? Are they trying to entertain their users? Are they, maybe, even doing this just for fun, because they are bored with the usual work? We&#8217;ll just have to see. If I pick up any information, I will post it right here on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sven-slootweg.nl/blog/2009/09/06/the-google-unexplained-phenomenon-part-2-the-story-goes-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
